The Two Witnesses of Revelation
Support Our Ministry

Blog

All (Humans) Can Come to Christ

All Can Come to Jesus Christ: Introduction and Purpose

Witness 1 and Witness 2

In Revelation 7, we are told about the “sealed” servants of God, with the mysterious verse about the 144,000, which many have interpreted in a variety of ways. While we’ve previously exposed new information on how this prophetic number could relate to our DNA, genetics, and blood, many overlook what is written afterwards:

Let us begin by looking at the words “nations” and “kindreds”:

  • Nations:

Word: eqnoj

Pronounce: eth'-nos

Strongs Number: G1484

Orig: probably from 1486; a race (as of the same habit), i.e. a tribe; specially, a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually, by implication, pagan):--Gentile, heathen, nation, people. G1486

  • Kindreds:

Word: fulh

Pronounce: foo-lay'

Strongs Number: G5443

Orig: from 5453 (compare 5444); an offshoot, i.e. race or clan:--kindred, tribe. G5453

Use: TDNT-9:245,1280 Noun Feminine

Heb Strong: H524 H1004 H1471 H3816 H4138 H4294 H4940 H7626

1) a tribe 1a) in the NT all the persons descending from one of the twelve sons of the patriarch, Jacob
2) a nation, people

When it comes to the question of whether or not ALL can come to Christ, could this verse possibly be any more clear? John describes a sea of people, so vast that he cannot even formulate an estimation of its size - it is uncountable. This sea of people includes a selection of those from all nations, races, ethnicities, tribes, languages, and people groups.

Gentile simply means non-Jewish; however, today, the terms "Gentile" and "Jew" are subject to a great deal of confusion and misinformation. There is a group of people today who claim to be Jews but are not Jews - this is the Synagogue of Satan. The Synagogue of Satan international organized crime syndicate has used this “Jewish” identity to deceive the masses, which most reading now understand. We have covered this extensively in our work, especially in Chapter V of The More Rational Worldview. For more on the identity of the true Jews, we discuss this more in Section 3. The point is that there is a group today that claims they are Jews, but they are not.

Notice that Revelation says nothing about only a true Jewish lineage being saved; rather, there are three distinct groups mentioned:

  1. Fake Jews who pretend they are Jews known as the Synagogue of Satan and those cast into hell or the lake of fire (not sealed by God).
  2. People who descend from the twelve tribes and are part of the 144,000 (sealed by God).
  3. A great multitude of saved Jews and non-Jews alike (sealed by God).

We recently received an email asking us about what we believe about this idea of a “one race salvation”, and this post is a response to not only that email but anybody seeking answers on this topic, known as the “Christian Identity” movement. As most readers know, this viewpoint is somewhat popular in various online communities, and this view essentially states there is only one race that can be saved: the white race.

Is this view correct?

Already, we discussed the powerful writing in Revelation 7:9, which is undeniable. This singular verse utterly and irrefutably proves that the Christian Identity movement is false and heretical. Still, we believe it is important to do a deep exploration into this subject to refute these ideas or help those struggling or questioning their views. Based on the title of this post, you have probably already figured out our thesis: All can come to Jesus Christ.

If you are a follower of the Christian Identity movement, please read this entire post, and if there is something we missed, feel free to contact us for questions or debate. We ask that anybody reading this does a genuine investigation of this topic. If you start reading this and dismiss this post and close the tab because you already have your firm, established views, you are already deceived and there is nothing that we can do for you. However, if you truly are a truth-seeker, then you will open yourself up to what we say and you will use Jesus Christ, evidence, and scripture to investigate our claim.

I commend the man who emailed us and reached out for a different viewpoint, and at the end of this writing we will share a brief testimony from him. So often, people see a website, it looks good, and they just believe everything it says. We should always test everything anyone says, even what is presented here. While we can back up everything we say with scripture, sources, and evidence, it is important to always go to God and the Bible to verify everything. Test the spirits!

If you believe the Bible is true, perfect, and the Word of God, which we do, then all the answers you need will be contained within it. We should not take away or add to the words of the Bible, and further, we should not trust in man but God. Anything that takes away - or in this case adds to - the Bible is, by definition, heresy. Heresy is a very dangerous thing, and can easily put your soul and salvation at risk.

We believe all humans can come to Christ, and we are going to address common arguments people are making for the idea that only one physical race is eligible for salvation. However, it’s important to differentiate between different races of humans and non-human entities in this post and emphasize why only humans are saved in Jesus Christ - not non-human entities such as Nephilim beings or those who have been altered out of the human image of God into a genetically different being.

However, that is not the main topic of this post, and more can be found on the non-human Nephilim fallen angel genetic manipulation in our writing It’s All About the Blood along with our Theology, Ontology, and Eschatology writing. Still, we will cover this more in Section 4, as it is important to recognize when we are discussing the issue of race.

So, let’s begin proving the statement that all humans of any race can come to Jesus Christ. We will be diving into the arguments presented by the most prominent of the Christian Identity movement sites at Christogenea.org, and why they are inherently flawed. This conclusive debunking will be divided into the following sections outside this introduction:

  • Section 1: Back to The Bible (Witness 2)
  • Section 2: Examining the Qualities of Writing From God (Witness 1 and Witness 2)
  • Section 3: Debunking Christogenea (Witness 1)
  • Section 4: Non-Human Bloodlines (Witness 2)
  • Section 5: Testimony - Overcoming “Christian Identity” (Witness 2)
  • Conclusion: Witness 1's Rant

Section 1: Back to the Bible

Witness 2

Before we dive into the Christian Identity arguments, we need to go back to the Bible itself. I am continually shocked by the amount of people who have not read the Bible in its entirety but are quick to trust websites and videos just because they quote scripture. I cannot emphasize enough the importance of knowing your Bible, and even if you haven’t finished it yet, it is time to examine scripture daily. Please spend less time trusting what man says and go back to the Word itself for answers.

For many, they will be wanting something “complex” to come from scripture about race and salvation, but honestly, it is straight to the point for us to understand. Not everything true has to be complex, and the beauty of the Bible is that anybody can open it up and examine it for themselves. So, can all come to Jesus Christ? Let’s test the Word of God.

  1. Yes, the Bible says all types of people can come to Christ (Galatians 3:28):

At the beginning of Galatians 3, Paul is calling out the “foolish” Galatians, saying the Old Law is a curse. Remember, as Christians, we are no longer “bound” to the Old Law in any way. Rather, we are given freedom through Jesus Christ. Therefore, even though we have proven that the Jews of today are not the true Jews of the Bible, it doesn’t really matter because we don’t follow the Old Law anymore. Witness 1 will dive more into this and who the true Jews are in Section 3. In the meantime, let’s consider what Paul is saying about who can come to Christ in Galatians 3:

To summarize, in verse 3:26, Paul says all who have faith in Jesus Christ are children of God.

In verse 3:27, he clearly says it does not matter what your race is, whether you descended from the true Jews or you are Greek (descended from gentiles or non-Jews), it doesn’t matter if you're male or female, and it doesn't matter your economic or class background. All are one in Christ - a new creature, even! When he says "neither Jew nor Greek", he is not saying that only those two ethnicities are eligible for salvation, but rather that race is not a component of Christian theology.

Finally, according to 3:29, if you follow Christ, you are NOW Abraham’s seed and PART of the true “Israelite” or “Jewish” bloodline. All who follow Jesus Christ - even if they do not come from Abraham’s seed - are saved. That is, if they follow Jesus Christ and are made a new creation. This imagery of being “grafted” into the salvation heritage of Abraham’s seed and covenant is found intertwined throughout the Bible at many different points in the New Testament, including Jesus’s words in the Gospels.

So, Jesus Christ has “opened up” salvation to ALL of non-Jewish heritage. Indeed, this was a major point of contention between both Jesus and Paul and the power structures of their day, the Pharisees and Sanhedrin, who greatly preferred a closed door salvation that only certain people were eligible for. I would even say that if they hadn’t espoused this radical and unprecedented view, it’s possible that neither Paul or Jesus would have been murdered like they were.

2. Jesus Christ accepted non-Jews in the Bible:

In the classic story of the Samaritan woman at the well, Jesus Christ himself accepts a woman of non-Jewish bloodline. To be clear, it appears the Samaritans were half-Jewish, half gentile, meaning not of a fully “pure” Jewish bloodline. There was a long-standing hatred between these two groups, so imagine the surprise of the Samaritan woman when Jesus asks her for a drink.

  • 9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.)
  • 10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.”
  • 11 “Sir,” the woman said, “you have nothing to draw with and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did also his sons and his livestock?”
  • 13 Jesus answered, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”
  • 15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water so that I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.”
  • 16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”
  • 17 “I have no husband,” she replied.
  • Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”
  • 19 “Sir,” the woman said, “I can see that you are a prophet. 20 Our ancestors worshiped on this mountain, but you Jews claim that the place where we must worship is in Jerusalem.”
  • 21 “Woman,” Jesus replied, “believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”
  • 25 The woman said, “I know that the Messiah (called Christ) is coming. When he comes, he will explain everything to us.”
  • 26 Then Jesus declared, “I, the one speaking to you— am he.”

In verse 21, Jesus is clear that salvation is no longer from the Jews, their temple, or their bloodline. In verse 22, Jesus explains that they have previously understood that salvation is from the Jews (Old Law). In verses 21 and 23, Jesus explains that worship and salvation is changing. Before, it was about the “bloodline” of the Israelites, but now it is about worshiping God in Spirit and in truth.

Jesus also lets her know that He is the Messiah. Isn’t it interesting he tells a non-Jewish person that He is the Messiah everyone has been waiting for? He doesn’t say, “I’m not your Messiah - but only the Messiah of the true Jews.” That’s what makes Jesus so amazing. He is the savior of the world - of all people of the world. Clearly, He knew this woman would share this information with others, in order to gather more to Him - Jew or non-Jew.

3. The message of Jesus Christ does NOT align with the Christian identity message.

Jesus’s message was absolutely revolutionary at the time and still is! The message of salvation was one so beautiful, so pure, that even a child could understand it. Jesus says we must be like children to get into heaven, and my experience with children is that they are so utterly accepting and loving of others - even those who appear differently. No wonder the infamous "they" do everything they can to corrupt children.

Who did Jesus come to save? Jesus was NOT as concerned with the hypocritical Pharisees, who did everything they could to mock and test Jesus’s truth. When Jesus spent time with the "true Jews" (for those who aren’t familiar, the Pharisees were a powerful, influential, legalistic, and highly religious group at the highest political strata of Jewish society), He spent much of His time arguing and debating them, but ultimately, most Jews actually rejected Jesus as their Messiah. Some came around to follow Jesus, but Jesus did NOT just come only for true bloodline Jews. Believing that Jesus came for just one race would mean you dismiss the entire central message of the Bible. Jesus died at the cross for ALL.

Moreover, Jesus came for the poor, the needy, and the least of them. When we think of the least of them in society, we often think of those in places like Africa, who are deeply impoverished and suffering - many of whom are black. What we do to the least of these is how we will be judged.

If Jesus were alive physically today, is anyone reading SERIOUSLY telling me he would deny someone a seat at his table because of their outer appearance or skin color? Jesus not only healed the lepers, who were certainly ghastly in appearance, but the Bible is clear that God looks at our hearts - not our outward appearance, like man does. The entire message of Jesus is contrary to the flesh. The flesh wants to judge things outwardly - the spirit must judge things through God.

Anyone who thinks they are better than another brother or sister because of what they look like has a spirit in them that is not of Jesus Christ. The Christian Identity movement has lost the spirit of love and truth that lives in Jesus, and has become blinded and sick through their own delusions, hatred, and prejudice.

In our worldwide ministry today, we are speaking to people of all nations - every nation, kindred, and tongue. That is exactly what Jesus called us to do in “The Great Commission”:

The Great Commission

16 Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

If there was only one physical race that could be saved, this verse would make much less sense. It does not say to make disciples of white people from European-origin nations. It says to make disciples of all nations. It couldn’t be any more clear, from examining the Bible, that all can come to Christ.

Indeed, these arguments only briefly scratched the surface of the case that could be built here, and to come up with ideas like the ones the Christian Identity movement has built requires an absurd level of extrapolation, conjecture, and theological addition and subtraction - one of the ideological habits that we are warned against most harshly in the Bible. Do NOT add to or take away from the Bible, this is extremely important. Upon simply reading it, it is clear that all can come to Christ for redemption and salvation.

Section 2: Examining the Qualities of Writing From God

Witness 2

Many readers take for granted the art of writing. In fact, many wouldn’t even recognize it as an actual spiritual gift that can be granted to a Christian, but it certainly can be used as a gift from God. Writing is a reflection of one’s heart and one’s mind. Consider this: God used the written word to reach billions upon billions of people over the years. How have people come to Jesus Christ through this written word? Well, the Bible is consistent, accurate, eloquent but at the same time, not too complicated to understand. The Bible is perfectly written, and therefore, it speaks truth (See Section II of The More Rational Worldview).

When Witness 1 and I set out on a writing task like this one, it is a laborious process that requires the Holy Spirit. We work together, often editing and collaborating on each other's work, bringing them together to a unified, cohesive whole. We believe we were gifted with the ability to write to reach the masses; however, none of this could be done without the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, to whom we are forever grateful.

If you go online and look for sites like ours, they are hard to find. Sure, there are commercialized Christian sites offering spiritual milk that are organized and clear, but chances are, this isn’t the truth you are seeking. Likely, you are looking for the deep mysteries and truths of the Bible that most are too afraid to discuss.

When you try to look for websites with truth, you will find sites like this false two witnesses site.

At first glance, this site appears “okay”, but I’d like to just share a screenshot of the site from an article I randomly clicked:

Honestly, this is just terrible writing. I am not even sure exactly what they are talking about, and the overuse of caps lock, exclamation points, and ellipses is unnerving. Now, before you think I am some “writing snob”, please do not see it that way. However, when we set out to write something for God, I sincerely believe the presentation is at least somewhat important. No, I do not think that God expects perfection, but what we write should be a reflection of who He is. Do you see a reflection of God in their writing?

I don’t. I see chaos and confusion, and that isn’t of God.

I want to be clear here. I am NOT saying that all writing from God needs to be academic, intellectual, or perfect. Rather, when something is written from God, it tends to have a sense of order, consistency, power, and flow. Think of the Bible - no matter how many people try to bash it, it is still amazingly written with complete unity.

As humans, we will fall short of God’s perfection, but when we write with the Holy Spirit, one will notice this beautiful unity and cohesiveness. Think about the times you’ve written online in defense of Jesus Christ. You feel your fingers flow with the Holy Spirit, and there is an indescribable power behind your words.

I used the above website as just an example to get you thinking. Feel free to judge their writings for yourself. Now, obviously, some of this evaluation is subjective, so that leads to my next point. Can we use some of the objective qualities of writing to judge truth in a work? Absolutely.

So, what does this have to do with Christogenea? Well, we need to examine their writing. I mean, after all, they make some extremely bold and unusual claims and are often proclaimed to be (at least by some) the epitome of wisdom, so, shouldn’t their writing reflect this? I mean, there are people reading this right now who are convinced that their site contains the Word of God and should be 100% followed. So, let’s examine it.

When we are trying to test the truth of anything we read, there are certain elements we should look for in their presentation. You will find that Christogenea appears to be academic and intellectual at first glance, which is very important to many readers. However, this is a false veneer of pseudo-intellectualism on a site that truly lacks theological substance. Honestly, their self-proclaimed tagline of "Christianity for the thinking man" is just laughable.

Many believe this site because of this ring of intellectualism. I did a sample of their text on this “readability consensus calculator” and it is “difficult to read”, meaning, it would likely take a college level education to understand.

Now you might be thinking, “But that means it is smart, and therefore it is good!” Please do not be fooled by the idol of hollow academia and intellectualism in this modern age. Remember, the wisdom of the world is foolishness before God. Jesus also reminds us that we must be like children to enter heaven, and let’s not forget this end times warning:

The highlighted warning is exactly what we find with those who follow false doctrines like Christian Identity. People spend their days constantly absorbing information, but they never come to any truth. This is all just foolishness before God. When you view their articles, they are very wordy and loaded with dubious information, but are they leading you to the ultimate truth?

So, again, just because something seems “difficult” or “intellectual” doesn’t mean it is right. In fact, I would argue that the overcomplication of a subject matter is often a sign of deception.

Think of the Bible. Its main tenets are so simple a child could understand; however, they are so complex they can take years to uncover. God did this intentionally. He made the Bible perfectly for anyone and everyone to be saved. It is not a hidden or occult knowledge that requires some type of intellectual arrogance. I could tell both a child and an adult what the golden rule means, and both would understand, though maybe with various levels of complexity.

Out of curiosity, I took a recent post by Witness 1, and this was just a casual blog post.

Then I took a sample from his most intense writing, and this is what it gathered:

What am I trying to get at here? There is a time and a place for high level academic writing, and there is a time and place for more casual writing. Neither is inherently good or bad. When Witness 1 wrote the first linked blog post, it was a more casual subject, and therefore, his writing may have been less academically intense. However, his work The More Rational Worldview is academically intense, and that is why so many from online message boards like it. They are seeking something intellectual.

Witness 1 truly has a gift because he knows when to be academic, and he knows when to be more casual. This is where I am calling some out. Just because something is intellectual or academic does NOT mean it is correct.

When we are getting into supposed academic writing, then this is when we need to examine it like a college professor would. So, that is what I am going to do with Christogenea’s site. Christogenea’s writing is mostly considered “intellectual” and “academic”, and therefore, that is how we are going to examine it.

This means I am going to be “tough” on it like a teacher, and remember, I have a Master’s degree and the “credibility” to do this. Still, college degree or not, every single person can do what we are doing with any type of writing in order to examine if it is true. Before I begin examining their academic quality:

  • This is NOT the only way we'll be examining if their work is credible. Later, we will go into spiritual arguments against their work.
  • Not ALL writing needs to be academic or intellectual to be true. There is a time and place for academic writing.

So, let’s begin:

  1. Inconsistent Citations: First, we will use this article to address the academic problem of inconsistent citations.

Academic writing should always have citations. These citations should be consistent, and they should be used in conjunction with something that you are stating as fact. For example, if I state that Genesis 1:1 says in the beginning God created the heavens and the planets, then you should be able to immediately check a citation for that. Notice, it doesn’t say that! It is so easy to slip in one or two words into a scripture or source that are not there, or in the same light, remove a word or two.

However, if I say something like “I think it is important to fast”, I can decide to link a source if I’d like to. The point is that in mostly academic writing, you need sources for things that you are stating as fact. If you view our blog posts, we do that in everything that we write. It takes a lot of time, and it can be tiring. Note, though, in things like my testimony, you will see less citations as those are personal experiences. Also, things that are common knowledge are usually not cited, but with scripture, one should assume something probably isn’t common knowledge. That is why I cite every verse I use, even common ones.

However, when one is claiming to know the true doctrine from God, especially when it comes to salvation issues like this, citations are absolutely critical and necessary.

Christogenea is inconsistent with use of citations. The proprietors of this website are being disingenuous in their writing by not citing some very debatable, controversial, and untrue statements. So, for example, in the above linked article, they write, “In the days of Abraham, every nation had its own gods.” While that may seem to be true or like it is common knowledge, it is important to note that they don’t use a citation here. What happens is they make a lot of statements without using citations, and therefore, people are assuming they are just correct.

They are inconsistent with their use of citations, and as they lay out an abundance of information, people will not check what they are stating. They will see a citation here or there, and assume it is correct. Then, they may see a fact with no citation, but just make an assumption that is correct. This is very dangerous, and it is a major way that people fall into false doctrine. Run as quickly as possible from anyone preaching to you without citations, especially for controversial or difficult topics like this.

This type of unsourced, opinion-based preaching is exactly how they get you! In my next point, I will talk about their bombardment of information, but let’s continue with citations. In this article, let’s look at this paragraph, where I marked where citations are needed:

  • The God and Messiah of Israel, Yahshua Christ, came only “but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (CITATION NEEDED), and there are many explicit statements in the New Testament which make it quite clear that the Redemption and the promises which are in Christ are applicable only to the children of Israel (CITATION NEEDED), who can certainly be identified in the Saxon, Keltic and related nations of Europe (CITATION NEEDED). However when aliens and Judaized Christians talk about God and Jesus, they refer not to the God of the Bible nor to the Christ of the Gospel (CITATION NEEDED). They can not be referring to Him, because the ideas (CITATION NEEDED - what ideas?) which they espouse are absolutely contrary to His Word. Rather, the aliens and Judaized Christians have formed their own god in their own image, and therefore they have created for themselves an idol.

This paragraph sounds correct, but notice they make numerous important and falsifiable statements without the necessary citations. If they turned this into any accredited university professor, they would not even likely receive a grade. The professors would send it back, say they need citations in what they write, and fail them. You can’t just make up theology and claim that it’s true - that’s not how it works.

Now, they do cite things here and there. I’m not claiming that there are no citations, but rather, their use is inconsistent. This is where the danger lies. Because they cite some things and not others, they have inconsistency in their credibility, and a false veneer of truth.

So, when you are looking at what we are writing, do I cite facts as needed? If you read everything we wrote so far, I have used necessary citations. This is because I learned how to do this in my Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees, and Witness 1 has as well. I am not saying that you need those things in order to be intelligent or understand citations, but for somebody who does not know this, they can be easily deceived.

Let us go into the next problem with their writings:

2. The “Gish Gallop” Fallacy

Witness 1

It’s quite difficult to get a handle on what exactly the proprietors of Christogenea believe, and I think they do this on purpose. These sites overwhelm you with links, verses taken out of context, hours and hours of podcast-type audio files, video after video, just hours and hours and page after page of pointless, meaningless rhetoric that, in the end, says nothing. Throughout their website they reference videos and audio like this 3 hour video. You are supposed to watch all of these videos to understand their full viewpoints, which is just ridiculous.

Wikipedia describes Gish gallop as, “a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm their opponent by providing an excessive number of arguments with no regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments.”

Christogenea is exactly like this - disorganized - page after page presenting hours of a person just droning on, link after link mischaracterizing verses, essays full of disinformation that go nowhere, and a selection of books for sale (of course). Nowhere do they present their doctrine concisely and clearly, and they have it this way on purpose. By concealing their doctrine, it makes it harder to debate them. They want you to waste your time listening to hundreds of hours of them talking, because they know if they provide their arguments in a concise, written form, it will be too easy to debunk them. The claims the Christian Identity belief makes are simply not Biblical, and it’s easy to show why.

Be very careful of any sites playing this game. They will use persuasive language and sophisticated rhetorical tricks to try and sway listeners through various appeals. When it’s in audio or video format, especially, they won’t cite anything - you will just have to trust them. The problem with videos is that people can make a lot of claims very quickly, and most of us do not have the time or patience to check out every claim. Much of what they say will be true and it will always sound good, but it will also always be mixed with a small number of lies that poison the whole lot of information.

Plenty of stuff will be sourceable, will be true, and/or will sound good, but a small amount will not be sourceable. This small amount of unsourceable lies and disinformation is the dangerous part that will lead you astray, and without seeing it in written form so you can immediately recognize, “Hey, there’s no citation or verse given here”, you’ll never know which is which.

This is why we have warned many times about not relying on videos or podcast-style audio for ministry. You need to open the Bible and look at the written word of God, which we will do in a moment. By the time you’ve listened to 300 hours of their droning, boring, and unsourced videos, you’ll just say, “Wow, well, they sure seem to know what they’re talking about! I guess I’ll trust them.” This is how you get hoodwinked into following false doctrine.

If a website can’t present their doctrine in simple, written terms, with citations and scripture to back it up, it is 100% dangerous disinformation - a mixture of truth and lies. That’s why everything we present is in written form, with links and sources immediately available so you can confirm for yourself what we say. All our doctrine is easy to find and is easy to understand as it merely follows the Bible exactly.

Indeed, written essays and books like we present (for free, I might add) are a much more reliable method of ascertaining, evaluating, and interpreting information, which is why the written word is the academic and intellectual gold standard. The switch from writing to most people getting their information, news, and theology from audio or video has had devastating effects on the epistemological foundations of truth for the masses. This switch was engineered intentionally by the Synagogue of Satan in order to make people easier to deceive and to get them used to not fact-checking and sourcing information that they hear or see.

Video and audio should be avoided at all costs, and when you resort to it you should be skeptical and asking yourself - if what they're saying is true, why are they so scared to write it out and present proper citations like we do? Are they lazy, disingenuous, lying, or just not capable of doing so?

Finally, let’s examine the actual writing of their text on defining Christian Identity, and let’s note if there are any citations, or if they are using any “Gish Gallop” techniques.

  • Christian Identity, also sometimes called Israel Identity, is the only true conservative Christianity (CITATION NEEDED)****. It is true because it seeks to maintain the understanding – in accordance with Scripture - that the New Covenant was made only with those same people with whom the Old Covenant was made: the House (family) of Israel and the House (family) of Judah (CITATION NEEDED). These Israelite people are traceable through time to the Keltic and Germanic tribes of today (CITATION NEEDED). None of these people are Jews (CITATION NEEDED)****. The Jews are descended from a mere remnant of the old Kingdom of Judah along with assorted Edomite and other Arabs who were mixed into the Roman province of Judaea during the Hellenic period (CITATION NEEDED). There are – at last count – at least sixteen detailed essays on this website which demonstrate this, and which are replete with Biblical, archaeological and historical citations.

There are NO citations here, and there are 16 essays that you have to check out to understand it! This is ridiculous. Note that the 16 essays which allegedly contain citations are not linked, and in reality there are far more than that on this site. This whole paragraph is a disingenuous, lying bait and switch, in which they falsely claim to have citations for these untrue, controversial statements without providing access to them immediately. When you go to look for these 16 essays and the supposed citations contained within them, you are swamped with too much information to reliably parse - exactly the trick they use to draw in the dumb and gullible, like I said.

  • Christian Identity is the belief that the Covenants of God are real and consistent. It professes that the people of the Old Testament were every bit as much Christian as the people of the New Testament (CITATION NEEDED). They were simply looking forward to the first advent of the Christ, while we today await His Second Advent. As the famous Christian bishop Ignatius said nineteen hundred years ago, Christianity did not come from Judaism: rather, Judaism is a perversion of Christianity (CITATION NEEDED). Christian Identity is therefore the original Christian Orthodoxy (CITATION NEEDED), and Christian Identity is the original catholic faith, in the true and original use of the word "catholic" by Christian writers of the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD (CITATION NEEDED).

Again, there are no citations, and they rely on an overwhelming amount of undefined words to confuse the reader.

  • Christian Identity is the belief that there is no disparity between the Word of God, His Creation, His prophecy, and world history. It is also the understanding that while Scripture was inspired by God when it was transmitted, men have certainly mistreated it since that time (CITATION NEEDED), and so every passage and every doctrine must be fully investigated from all of the most ancient sources possible. As it reads in the King James Version: Study to show thyself approved (CITATION NEEDED).

Still, no citations, though this is a paragraph many would agree with without the use of citations. This is what they do though - they mix some truth with lies.

  • The audio file attached to this page is perhaps one of the best we have to offer for introducing Christian Identity to the uninitiated. [It can be downloaded on the page which you are directed to by clicking here.] Please listen to it objectively, rather than regarding the slanders of the ADL and similar Jewish organizations – forever the enemies of Christ.
  • This paper is under development, and so is this website – always. We pray that you consider the things written here, and also in all of our other papers. And if you are one of His called, May God favor your journey.

Ahh, yes, we must go to a nearly 2 hour video clip to test all he says. Are you going to do it?

Now, chances are, if you do listen to their clip, there may certainly be some truth! However, you must be able to truly examine EVERY WORD they say before considering it the truth, and that is what we are going to do in the next section.

Section 3: Examining The Christian Identity Arguments

Witness 1

Ok, so now that we have figured out that their writing is suspiciously overdone, lacks many necessary citations, and is a textbook example of the Gish gallop fallacy, does that by itself mean it is not true? Certainly not. There can be bad writing and good arguments, so we must examine their arguments fairly.

This is the Christian Identity claim, boiled down to its simplest form:

  1. The true Jews of today are “White Christians”, and being part of this ethnic-genetic group is the only way to be saved through Jesus Christ.

So before we get into their doctrines, what truth do they present? Well, in this case - like I said earlier - I agree with them that the true Israelites of the Old Testament, the people who wrote the Bible, are not those who claim to be Jews today. Those who claim to be Jews today are the “Synagogue of Satan” – “Those who claim to be Jews but are not, and are liars.”

In The More Rational Worldview, I present conclusive evidence that the real Israelites were white, including Adam and Jesus, just like they’ve always been portrayed in almost every depiction of them ever. This shouldn’t really be a surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention.

To summarize Chapters I and V in the book (read at the link above for sources and more detail on these claims), I elaborated on the early 20th century schism between the true Jews, many of whom were aware of this truth, and a sinister group of powerful “Zionist” Jews who muscled their way in through planned wars and false flag events like the Lusitania, leading to the Balfour Declaration, and from there to World War II and the creation of their Satanic and deceptive state of Israel.

This is the origin of the Synagogue of Satan international organized crime syndicate, and I recommend reading more about that in my first book linked above to understand the 20th century, 9/11, how we got where we are, and more about the “true” Jews versus these Zionist fraudsters. Indeed, Christogenea isn't totally off-base all the time, for example when they say that the ADL only exists to spite and destroy Jesus Christ and everything he stands for, they are 100% correct.

Those who claim to be Jews today, but aren’t, are really Edomites, Khazarians, or some sort of mixture of more Arabic, Canaanite-type blood. The higher-ups, like the Rothschilds, might even have some Nephilim blood, and thus, not be fully human, which we will discuss more in Section 4. These fallen angel imposters may have even existed in Jesus’s time, and may have been who he was referring to when he told the Pharisees, “You are of your father, the devil.”

However, it’s not that important, for the purposes of this post, to go too deeply into exactly who the “Jews” of today are. All you need to understand is that they aren’t the Jews in the Bible, and they’re not the people who wrote the Bible. Christogenea is correct about that.

I can also agree that the Synagogue of Satan false Jews are executing a massive conspiracy in order to wipe out and subjugate the true Jews because they can’t stand knowing that they aren’t who they claim to be. It kills them that the original “chosen” race still exists, and it’s not them, so they are doing everything they can to flood white countries with other races, take over their governments, and use financial schemes to utterly destroy the will, lives, happiness, and freedoms of white people. Satan seeks to abuse, subjugate, and destroy white people, and we face an extreme level of attack in our countries using unprecedented methods.

This is an obvious fact that can be clearly understood simply by opening a window and looking around. Much more on this can be found if you search with a genuine heart for understanding.

Further, one can be against multiculturalism and not believe in the Christian Identity claims of a one-race salvation. It's plain to see that forced and involuntary mixing of different cultures and races can create problems and disasters in a society, and even mainstream sources like Psychology Today can admit this. Many get distracted by a “race war” when that is not the essential issue.

The problem is the elite planning forced multicultural efforts that upset the balance of many homogenic societies. The world was simply a happier and more interesting place when Japan was Japanese, Arabia was Arab, and Europe was European, and everyone alive was happier being around people they look like and whose values they share. Later, in section 4, we will discuss the divide and conquer tactics of the elite, and how this war may actually be about humans vs. non-humans, not physical races at all.

So, all that being said, it's clear that there is a substantial amount of truth presented on Christogenea, and I have no problem conceding that. However, we now come to the question: What, exactly, are Christian Identity's theological doctrines on race and are they Biblical?

Like I said, it was pretty difficult to pin them down and get them from a solid source in a simple, concise, and written format, because once you hear them it’s pretty obvious this is a fringe belief that doesn’t have a Biblical leg to stand on. So, let’s start with Wikipedia. Wikipedia describes Christian Identity beliefs as follows:

So far, like I said, I agree with this. Let’s go on:

  • Christian Identity promotes the idea that all non-whites (people who are not of wholly European descent) will either be exterminated or enslaved in order to serve the white race in the new Heavenly Kingdom on Earth under the reign of Jesus Christ. Its doctrine states that only "Adamic" (white) people can achieve salvation and enter paradise.

*Record scratch*

Wait, wait, wait…. You’re telling me that these people think that anyone who isn’t European will be either “exterminated or enslaved” under Jesus Christ, and this can be backed up by the Bible? What??

I found this so incredible and almost unbelievably, psychotically un-Biblical, that I had to confirm it myself from a primary source. So, I went to the website of “The Church of Israel”, a Christian Identity church based in Southwest Missouri.

Boy, nothing says “I was a stranger and you welcomed me”, quite like a big sign on your church that says, “PRIVATE PROPERTY – ATTENDANCE BY INVITATION ONLY!”, huh?

What would Jesus do, am I right?

Anyways, like usual, their site is dressed up very professionally, with lots of buzzwords, nice pictures, and paragraphs of content that make their site seem very Christian, very wholesome, and very family friendly.

However, within their “Doctrines” page, we quietly find this:

“We believe that election is by race”. No, that’s not a typo – it’s not supposed to say “Grace”. Race. “Election [by race] was purposed from the Father before the foundation of the world.”

So, if you’re not a fully white European, sorry, you’re out of luck! You’ve been predestined to either “extermination or enslavement”, God created you as merely the butt of a cruel joke, and there’s nothing you can do about it. Turns out we were all wrong - free will wasn't real after all! Needless to say, this throws a huge wrench into numerous parts of Christian theology.

Now, both Witness 2 and I are white. We are pure Europeans, and I’m even willing to say that I’m proud of that heritage. However, let me be clear – what this church is saying is blasphemous heresy of the absolute highest degree. It is a moral abomination, and an insult to God to preach this nonsense. This is a dangerous, spiritually deadly, and venomous form of twisted pseudo-Christianity, deformed by the Devil to lead all those who believe it, white or not, to hell.

The whites who believe it will go to hell because they aren’t following Jesus in the slightest, and those who aren't white and believe it are at risk because they will simply give up, decide Christianity is “not for them”, and lose all hope and faith. Nice work, people.

The truth is simple. All you need is the Bible, you don’t need website after website spamming endless links, dozens of hours of podcasts, or countless essays that don’t even say anything to know the truth. All of that is just to create an illusion of intellectual prowess, the spectacular floating Wizard concealing the hidden truth – that these beliefs are unsupported and Biblically contradictory. If you’re going to contradict the Bible, you might as well just start your own religion, not co-opt Christianity for your own purposes, goals, and desires.

Take, for example, the last Christian Identity site we will briefly look at, Sacred Truth Ministries. In an attempt to find a simple and concise layout of their doctrine, I went to a page where they have articles, hoping for one or two titled something like “What We Believe”, or “A Biblical Basis for Why Non-Whites Can’t Go to Heaven”.

Instead, their “Articles” section contained three links. One was a “Health Bulletin Board” with some extremely dubious articles debating about eating pork (already settled numerous times in the New Testament) or how “boron can cure cancer”, and the other was called “Uncategorized”, containing such gems as “Eat the Cheese – humorous cartoon PDF”, “polska”, and “The Dragon Vomits forth a Flood and Nebuchadnezzar’s Image - Christendom - The Last Kingdom of this Earth’s Age & Of Floods and Famines and Flimsy Arguments”. Talk about your Gish gallop.

So, I ended up on the third page in their articles sections, Robert’s Ruminations, where I was hoping to find the bulk of their doctrine. Instead I found a massive list of links, a small amount of which can be seen below:

I was curious exactly how long this list was, as it is clearly quite massive, so I copied it into a Word document. I found that these links go on for 14 pages and there are 722 lines, or separate links. Once again, I have to say this website is a perfect example of Gish gallop, just so much nonsense that it swamps the reader - and those who are susceptible will believe it just because there’s so much information being thrown at them at once.

Tell me, do these people really think that anyone is going to read through their 722 different little poorly-written essays just to get a handle on what they believe? This is largely the issue with Christian Identity, as I pointed out, they either consciously or unconsciously know that their doctrine is absurd, immoral, incorrect, blasphemous, heretical, unpalatable, offensive, and contradicts the entire message of Jesus, so they have to bury it under piles and piles of bullshit. Be very wary of these types of ministries.

Let’s go a little deeper into their beliefs. Two of their core doctrines are the “Serpent Seed” doctrine, and the “Pre-Adamic races” doctrines. Both of these are false, according to the Bible, and I’ll show you why.

Instead of spending hours upon hours listening to this one guy’s opinion on how only whites can be saved, we should be studying our Bibles and going back to scripture so that we can ensure we are believing in correct doctrine.

So, let's do that.

  • First, Christogenea claims, “The people of the Old Testament were every bit as Christian as the people of the New Testament.”

This absurd statement completely mischaracterizes Judaism and what was written in the Old Testament. There was an Old Law, and God commanded the Jews. The Jews at the time were not considered Christian, as Christianity did not come to be until after Jesus Christ. The Old Law was written for the Jews of the time, and is no longer in effect since Jesus fulfilled it. I have recently written on the Old Law and New Law here for more information.

Already, when a website makes such a flawed, nonsensical, and absurd claim, one has to just stop and think. If they are wrong about one thing, they are probably wrong about many other things. They also didn’t use scripture to back up this claim, as to do so would be impossible. This statement is so obviously false it would be laughable if this website wasn't leading people to hell.

Let’s dig into this deeper, starting with a fringe belief within Christianity called the “Serpent Seed” doctrine. This ideology, which essentially hypothesizes that Cain was the result of Eve having sex with Satan as part of the original fall of man, has been used by many false prophets to sow division and discord, and it is clearly debunked by a simple read of Genesis 4:1:

  • Adam made love to his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, “With the help of the LORD I have brought forth a man.”

Therefore, anyone who believes the Bible is infallible, as we do, can’t believe in the Serpent Seed doctrine entirely, or rather, this specific theory about Cain. He was Adam’s child, and he was “a man”.

However, I believe that this is missing the point, and as usual, people’s thoughts and ideas have been manipulated through disinformation placed by the usual bad actors. There is, undeniably and explicitly, a Satanic, Luciferian, fallen angel bloodline introduced onto Earth later in Genesis:

  • 1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
  • 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
  • 3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
  • 4 There were giants (Nephilim) in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
  • 5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
  • 6 And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
  • 7 And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
  • 8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.
  • 9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.

Now, this is one of the strangest and most enigmatic Bible chapters of all. Given that angels don’t typically have the bodily means to impregnate humans, it’s a safer assumption to think that they were likely using some sort of advanced technology to achieve this goal.

Therefore, the Nephilim bloodline was, most likely, originally conceived through a combination of in vitro fertilization and gene therapies, potentially even the same mRNA-based genetic engineering technologies we see “rolled out” today as a “miraculous” game-changer in the field of medicine.

So, what does it mean when it says, “Noah was perfect in his generations”? It is referring to “genes”, and the reason the flood had to happen is because the entire bloodline of man would have been polluted if God didn’t create that bottleneck and only allow Noah’s bloodline to proceed forward.

This was necessary in order to continue the genetic line that led to Jesus Christ and fulfill the prophecy in Genesis that the “seed” of Eve would, eventually, “crush the serpent’s head underfoot”.

  • Pre-Adamic Races

While GotQuestions.org certainly has its flaws, I think that it debunked and explained the Pre-Adamite race theory quite well and I don’t have much more to add:

  • The concept of a pre-Adamic race is the idea that God created a race of humans who lived on the Earth before He created Adam, the first man. This hypothesis has been promoted by various scholars at various times throughout history. Roman Emperor Julian the Apostate (circa A.D. 331–363) and Calvinist theologian Isaac de La Peyrère (1596-1676) are two notable examples.
  • La Peyrère cited Scripture to support his hypothesis. Cain’s fear of being lynched, his marriage to an unknown woman and the fact that he founded a city (Genesis 4:14-17) are all interpreted as evidence that another race of men coexisted with Adam and his family.
  • By now it’s obvious how misinterpreting one or two passages of Scripture can lead to all kinds of warped perceptions. The Scriptural problems with La Peyrère’s interpretations are numerous.
  • First, Adam is called the “first man” (1 Corinthians 15:45). This is inconsistent with the idea that God created men before Adam. Second, according to La Peyrère, the Gentiles were to live outside of the Garden of Eden while Adam enjoyed paradise (a privilege which came with the responsibility of obeying the Law of Paradise—not eating the forbidden fruit). Genesis 2:5-8, however, says quite plainly that before God created “the man whom He had formed,” the very same man which He placed in the garden, there were no men upon the earth to cultivate the ground. Third, God created Eve for Adam because he was alone, there was no one else like him around (“It is not good for the man to be alone… but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him” Genesis 2:18, 20). Fourth, Adam named his wife “Eve” “because she was the mother of all the living” (Genesis 3:20). The list goes on, but these passages should suffice to refute La Peyrère’s misinterpretation.
  • As for Cain’s fear of being lynched, his marriage to an unknown woman and the fact that he founded a city (Genesis 4:14-17), Adam was almost 130 years old by the time that Cain killed Abel (Adam had Seth, his next son after Abel’s death, when he was about 130 years old; Genesis 4:25; 5:3). And we know that Adam had sons and daughters (Genesis 5:3). At 130 he could have had grandkids and great-grandkids by the time that Cain killed Abel. Cain had plenty of family members to be afraid of after killing his brother.
  • Cain apparently married a family member (a necessity back then) at some point before Abel’s murder. It seems odd to us today, but incest wasn’t outlawed by God until the Law of Moses. It may have been around that time that generations of degenerative genetic mutations began to take a toll on our DNA. God outlawed incest for our protection. It became (and remains) dangerous for close relatives to procreate because of shared genetic defects which become expressed in their children causing severe deformities and other problems.
  • As for Cain founding a city, if he lived to be the average age back then, he probably lived to be about 900 years old. By the time he died, his family would have been a small city. If Cain had a child at the age of 30, and his child had a child at the age of 30 and so on, Cain could have produced 30 generations by the time he died (30 generations times 30 years each equals 900 years).
  • The real problem with the [pre-Adamite race] theory is that it places human mortality (pre-Adamic human mortality) before Adam’s sin. The Bible is quite clear that death entered in through Adam’s sin. “For since by a man came death, by a man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive” (1 Corinthians 15:21-22). Regardless of whether or not we believe in animal mortality before sin, the Bible is quite explicit about human mortality before Adam’s sin. There wasn’t any. To deny this is to deny a central Christian doctrine.

So, while I do agree that the white race is the “Adamic” race, to hypothesize about either the Serpent Seed doctrine or any pre-Adamic races existing on Earth is truly the height of conjecture, adds to the Bible, and consists of believing in quite obviously heretical, dangerous beliefs.

There simply isn’t a way to Biblically prove these beliefs using scripture without coming up with some incredibly fantastic hypotheses and extrapolations. This is the incorrect way to read your Bible.

So, does it matter today that the Adamic Jews of the Bible were white?

Well, yes and no. From a historical perspective, it matters in that it allows us to, finally, understand world events based on a realistic worldview, not a pack of Satanic lies fed to us by, mainly, the Rothschilds and their peons. From a historical interest perspective, it’s fascinating, one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated on the world, and it can greatly help in explaining events like the Lavon Affair, the USS Liberty, and 9/11.

However, from a theological perspective, it matters almost not at all.

While I think it is interesting to research and may help us understand the lies we are told about history better, I don’t think we are called to idolize or worship a specific bloodline - we only worship Jesus Christ.

In fact, I think that one should be more concerned about our argument that there are two or more bloodlines on this planet. One is human, and one is not. In our writing titled, It’s All About the Blood, we have laid out evidence that the Bible explains that there is a fallen, Satanic bloodline that walks amongst us. These people disguise themselves as human, but they have “fallen angel” DNA. This is the key to understanding that this is a bloodline war - not a physical race war.

A quick Google search will reveal who claims to be Jews today, and how rich they are! It is easy to figure out who the Synagogue of Satan is because these people are NOT Christian (or Jewish, for that matter) and openly follow Satanic and occult practices. Plus, many of them are leaders of the world and are using their “religion” to bring in their Satanic new world order. These are the “jews” like the Rothschilds and Larry Silversteins of the world.

To think that people like the Rothschilds and Larry Silverstein are descended from the people that wrote the Bible is, just as much as the serpent seed doctrine, just the height of absurdity and fallacy.

Section 4: Non-human Bloodlines

Witness 2

We have written extensively on the Hegelian Dialectic, and how the elite “play all sides.” How is it possible that these “people” can do this? This is where I need readers to seriously consider that whoever “rules” over this world is not of a human bloodline.

We are now in the end times, and we are now unlocking the secrets and mysteries of Daniel.

If you are reading this, it is now time to deeply consider that everything, and I mean everything, the world tells you is a lie.

One thing that has been completely dismissed in church teachings is the possibility that there is another bloodline - one that is not of Adam - that walks amongst us. Is this scriptural? Absolutely.

We have already covered this extensively in “It’s All About The Blood”, but I wanted to add to this investigation in this post.

Let’s go back to Genesis 4, where some type of key division happened between Cain and Abel. I am using the concordance here, so that we can really make sure we are getting the proper language and understanding of what is happening. For context, this is where Cain slays Abel because of his wrath.

The two key words I want you to pay attention to are mark and presence.

There is something extremely interesting to note here about this word. While it is used as “mark” here, it is used as “token” in other places. Still, the word is the same. Why did the translators change mark from token in different contexts? We will never know the truth, but that is why I always use the concordance to get true meaning, as there can be nefarious translators who do not want readers to understand something.

So where is the word mark or H226 used in other contexts, so we can understand its full meaning?

So, in Genesis 4:15, the term mark is used, but then it is shifted to token. Remember THEY MEAN THE SAME THING, so I have no idea why the writers thought token would be a better interpretation. Perhaps due to connotation? Mark has a more negative connotation, whereas token has a more positive connotation. To me, mark would make much more sense in Gen 9: 12, 13, and 17.

So, why don’t we go back to those verses and put the word mark?

It would read: This is the “mark of a/the covenant” three different times, and yes, mark would be the correct interpretation.

Well, when we think of mark, what other verse comes to mind? Oh yes! The MARK of the beast (Revelation 13:16, Greek).

This word “mark” is very important, and as we have written many times, the “mark” referred to in Revelation is a DNA change. Just to note, it is a different concordance entry, and a different Greek and Hebrew word that Cain's "mark".

Still, let's remind ourselves of the perfect unity of the Bible. In Genesis, it's all about a mark, and in Revelation, it's the same.

Now, could God have put some type of “mark” on Cain’s bloodline that altered his DNA and changed the course of history? It makes complete sense. There is a mark/token for God, and there is a mark for Satan.

The other bloodline was marked or received a “token” of God’s seal, while Cain’s bloodline was marked with something evil that was passed down from generation to generation.

Now let’s go back to Genesis 4:16, where Cain is literally taken from the “presence” of the Lord, or His face.

Because of this mark, He could no longer see His face - he could no longer stand in God’s presence.

We believe this is also true of the “mark of the beast”, which we believe defiles the holy temple (body), and does not allow God to dwell there anymore. In other words, those who take the mark can no longer see the face of God.

So, what does this all have to do with what we are saying? I am here to propose that whatever happened in Genesis 4 was the beginning of “another bloodline” that walks amongst us now.

This is Satan’s bloodline, and this can be backed up by scripture.

Scripture #1: Satan has offspring in the earth.

In Genesis 3:15, God pronounces punishment upon the Serpent for deceiving Eve and says to Satan, "And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel."

Scripture #2: The Pharisees at the time of the Messiah were children of Satan.

In John 8:44, the Messiah says to the Pharisees:

"You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

Scripture #3: The parable of the wheat and tares refers to children of Satan and children of God.

This parable is explained by Jesus in Matthew 13:36-43, stating:

"The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one"

The Jews were forbidden by God to intermarry or mix with the tribes that inhabited the area in and around the "Promised Land". When the Jews went to conquer the Promised Land, God gave them the surprising command to completely massacre these tribes down to the last man, woman, or child. The reason why is because many of these tribes were descendants of the Nephilim bloodline.

Ever wondered why the long and detailed genealogies are so prominent in the Bible? One reason is to prove a descent that is pure and not involved with these "serpent"/Satanic bloodlines.

What does this all mean for you? Stop judging people by their outer appearances, and start listening to scripture. We have stated many times that there were those who claim to be Jews (the Godly bloodline), but they are NOT. They are the bloodline of Satan.

There are those walking amongst us who are not human, and they are not made in God’s image. This has nothing to do with their outer appearance, as they are able to disguise themselves in various ways so that they seem human.

These “beings” have gotten a large portion of the world to take a DNA-altering vaccine, so that others are inwardly marked, like Cain was.

So, while you all are focusing on the color of someone’s skin, you completely missed the MARK of the beast - the mark of Satan’s bloodline.

Finally, just to add one last thought. Have any of you ever taken a DNA test? If you do, you might be shocked to see what your true bloodlines are, and they may not be what you suspect. Chances are, there are very few “pure” bloodlines left, and geneticists show we are all “genetic mutts’’ on some level. In fact, those deeply concerned about preserving their bloodlines are often the elite, Satanic “royal bloodlines” who inbreed and participate in incest, which often lead to genetic problems.

So, the question is - does Christogenea make everyone take a DNA test to join their movement? If so, what if their DNA is mostly from the groups listed, but maybe 5% something else? Are they disqualified? What is the cutoff for salvation, according to them?

I am going to assume that they don’t do this, and they claim “God only knows but gives us revelation to our true heritage” or something along those lines.

Wouldn’t that be a dangerous game? There may be seemingly “white” people around pretending they are “pure”, and they are not. You see - it is just ludicrous even trying to prove one is of a “pure bloodline” in the first place. There are so many issues that can arise from just this one claim, and on this note - I’d like to see a DNA test from the founder of the website! Still, even DNA tests aren’t perfectly accurate, and you can’t honestly say there is a perfectly reliable source for anyone’s bloodline today. Even the detailed family tree someone has can contain lies or errors. Man is just not to be trusted.

Jesus would accept you reading, if you are white or black or something else - if you are a Jew or gentile or something else. In fact, I have even argued that He would allow a vaccinated person to repent (link here).

You see, Jesus is HOPE, and when we say that Jesus isn’t hope for humans, we take away His most important message.

Stop being greedy and trying to keep that message of love and hope for yourself because it is for everyone - and only Satan would want to keep that away from people.

We are not special or chosen because of anything in our own power. We are special and chosen because of the power of God and our choice for following Jesus Christ. That’s it.

Section 5: Testimony of Overcoming "Christian Identity"

Witness 2

Now, I was honestly shocked when someone emailed us, asking if they were actually not saved due to this notion of a “one race theory.” Right now, Witness 1 and I are ministering to people all over the world, and I honestly just never stopped to think there were people out there told they couldn’t come to Jesus Christ because of the color of their skin.

Let me be more clear. I have heard of the theory before, but my experience has just shifted my views. I have been a minority a large part of my life. A large majority of my friends are not white, and I was baptized by a black pastor. I know this sounds cliché and what many "liberals" would call out as "pandering", but I am being serious. I just never had it in me to have any problems with any other race simply due to the color their skin. I am not saying I have never been mistreated by someone of another race, but I have been mistreated by plenty of white people, too. I guess the conclusion I came to with Jesus Christ, and why I loved Him so much, is that everyone is kind of a jerk, or to put it more eloquently, we all fall short of the glory of God. It doesn't seem like anyone is really nice to anyone, unless it's some form of fakery. Chosen race? Everyone seems terrible. Honestly, even the white people spouting this chosen stuff...many of them are just sitting on online boards all day, without a job, complaining about other races for all of their problems - NOT the true culprits.

Look, I don't mean to come off as harsh. I still love my white brothers and sisters, too. The point is, everyone sucks.

I'm not dismissing the arguments that white people are being destroyed; however, when I've looked at people as individuals - not groups of people - I just always seem to have a better experience with them. Plus, who is destroying the white people? It's more largely these fake Jews than anyone else. Still, Witness 1 can vouch that people have been very, extremely cruel to me in my life of all races. I just gave up on thinking it was anything other than Satan or demons working through people because that's what the Bible says.

Going back to the reader, I am NOT making fun of this person. This person is quite intelligent and truly was considering the evidence put before him by sites like Christogenea. In fact, thanks to this man, we were inspired to write a post that will hopefully help many see the truth.

Honestly, I want you to truly consider if you’d turn away anyone asking for salvation in Jesus Christ? If a black, Hispanic, or some other race other than white emailed you, and they asked you if they could be saved, would you honestly say no and deny them salvation? Does that at all seem like what Jesus would do in any capacity?

When we first sent this man a message that He CAN be saved through Christ he was elated:

In this email, he was asking us if we could write something on this topic, and that is exactly what we did. I then asked him for an updated testimony (it’s been over a month since he emailed us), and this is what he said:

Now this man can focus on being a TRUE man of God. Satan tried to stop that, and if you support these “one race” salvation movements, you are stopping SO MANY people coming to Jesus Christ.

If you are wrong, you will burn in hell for stopping the salvation of those who can be saved. I would deeply, deeply reflect on what you believe and if it is biblically-based.

I thank the man for allowing me to use his testimony, and in all honestly not sure exactly which race he is, but I will say this to him.

Witness 1 and I are white, and we welcome you into our family as a brother in Christ. We thank you for reaching out to us, and we are so thankful you have accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. We pray you will become a great man of God and lead many to Christ - in Jesus’s name!

Conclusion

Witness 1

Well, this has been a fun post - I'm sure it will be a real hit and we'll get a ton of nice messages after it. Like Tom MacDonald said, "mention race in a song and I'm scared I'll get killed for it". This is a controversial subject, and the sad reality is that those on both extremes of the political spectrum - the hard right and the hard left - would both probably want to kill us after reading this.

This is what makes our ministry so difficult. As one reader astutely pointed out in the past through email, we are alienating every single side, and making ourselves "pariahs". On one hand, I talk about race, and I use the phrase "white people" in a way that is not degrading and self-hating.

Liberals: Death

On the other, I say that people of all races can be saved through Jesus Christ.

Right-wing Extremists: Death

We criticize Trump and say he is the anti-Christ, which pisses off conservatives. On the other hand, I call out the Synagogue of Satan fake Jews regularly, which pisses off liberals, among many other things I write.

As the reader I mentioned above noted, this makes us "pariahs" - hated by both sides. However, I am OK with that. If you still buy into the false dichotomy of "left vs right", it's time to grow up and peel back that curtain.

There is no "good side", and there are no "good guys" in power coming to save you. They're all in on it together. No matter how many memes Elon Musk posts, he was still involved with the CIA child sex trafficking ring as Trump, Hillary, Ted Cruz, Bernie, Rand Paul, and any other of these pathetic psychopaths that run our society.

So, stop thinking with the black and white paradigm. There is only one black and white decision you need to make - is the Bible true or not? I'm willing to say that I have 100% conclusively and irrefutably proven that it is in The More Rational Worldview, and everything else just follows from that.

On that note, there simply isn't a Biblical leg for the Christian Identity beliefs to stand on here. If what they said was true, it would be immediately obvious. The Bible doesn't play games like this, it would literally just say, "This offer is only extended to Greeks, Europeans, and Israelites", or something along those lines.

That's why these sites don't present any real Biblical arguments - they don't have any. What they do have is the desire for it to be true, because it would fit their own biases, prejudices, and pre-conceived ideas, as well as validate the hate and anger they feel towards the world, those in it, and those they perceive as "other".

Now, like I've said in my writing, the problems we face cannot be solved by a race war or attacking the "Jews". This is a metaphysical, spiritual battle, and it cannot be won in the physical realm. The question of violence in Christianity, and when it is Biblically justified, is a tricky one, one that I have referenced but never attempted to give a 100% conclusive answer to, because it's just too nuanced. It's not a black and white issue.

However, one thing I can say for sure - starting or buying into a race war won't solve our problems, and race is not a component of Christian theology. I'm sorry for those this may offend, like the people who read Christogenea, but it's just the truth. Deep down inside, I think you know it is, too.

So, let's say you're right. Somehow, there is a mysterious, hidden doctrine within the Bible that almost everyone else except you has missed, that says only white people can be saved through Jesus. There's nothing to explicitly support this, and tons to contradict it. What do you gain? Even if you're white, you gain nothing - you would have been saved anyways.

Let's say you're wrong. The obvious, clear meaning of the Bible is correct, and the Gospel is meant for all humans. What do you gain? Nothing.

What do you lose? Everything. You potentially lose EVERYTHING, and are putting yourself well at risk of going to hell. Maybe it "feels good" to believe this stuff, but in my opinion, it's not worth the risk.

If there was a real argument for it, maybe the calculation would be different. But, there isn't. There is not one single, real, powerful Biblical or theological argument with any veridicality that the Christian Identity movement can point to. However, there are tons of good arguments against it.

Now, I'm obviously no liberal, I think it's quite clear that I lean more conservative. On the other hand, I can't STAND conservatives in this country. The conservatives are a joke. $20 trillion for pointless, endless wars in the Middle East, $10 trillion for the banks, $2 trillion for PPP loans for the rich forgiven, but you want some student loan relief - NOPE, SUCK IT AND DIE, PEASANT!

It's a complete joke. As soon as we start casting plagues, Washington D.C. is FIRST on the list, and I won't be discriminating based on political party. I write this to try and nudge those supporting Christogenea to let go of this tribal, sports team mentality. The world and Christian theology isn't black and white when it comes to these complicated issues. Truly, it's just not as simple as "white people can be saved but no one else can". This is the type of simplistic idea that an edgy middle schooler would come up with as a joke right after carving a swastika into his desk.

So, before sending us hateful and angry messages, think about what I said and remember we are just humans, too. Pascal's wager can be applied to other areas, and, as I've said, I consider it a valid philosophical construct. When applied here, it's clear which side of the debate has more to gain, and which has more to lose. On top of that, this debate is absurdly unbalanced, with too much evidence debunking Christian Identity to even write here, but literally not one real argument supporting it.

The Synagogue of Satan wants you to buy into their race war - don't fall for it. Stick to the Bible, and always remember - what would Jesus do? Tell the black guy or Mexican to get out of his face and go die because of the color of his skin? Probably... not.

God bless you all

-Witnesses 1 and 2